Skip to main content
Version: 0.7.0

SAF and IT management crosswalk

The matrix shows nearest concepts but does not define an automatic transformation. Each cell uses a correspondence type and a confidence code:

  • D — direct, P — partial, C — composite, NA — not applicable;
  • H — high confidence, M — medium, L — low.

For example, C/H means that a SAF object is consistently expressed through a combination of several concepts. Full scale definitions are in the common overview, while boundaries for CIs, assets, and records are on the relationships page.

ITSM, RITM, and ITIL

SAF objectITSMRITMITIL Version 5
ActorCustomer, user, provider, owner, and support role — P/H: roles of one Actor.Consumer, participant, and management role — P/M.Stakeholder, service consumer, customer, user, or sponsor — P/H.
ChannelPortal, service desk, point of contact, or access channel — P/M.Consumer interaction plus an operational point of contact — C/L.Service interaction or touchpoint — P/M; no separate formal type is publicly defined.
ServiceService — D/H; ITSM adds relationships and delivery terms.Product or service in the management scope — D/M for Service; Product is broader.Service — D/H; offering and product are separate management contexts.
ProcessProcess or part of a management practice — P/H.Process and operational activity — D/M.Value stream, lifecycle activity, and management practice — C/H.
CapabilityOrganizational or service-management capability or practice — P/M.Capabilities, competencies, resources, and management area — C/M.Management practice and four dimensions — C/M.
Information ObjectTicket, configuration record, knowledge, or documented information — P/M.Managed object, document, and factual control data — P/L.Information, resource, or record in the lifecycle — P/M; no common class equals SAF.
SystemService system, application service, or application CI — C/M.System in the IT architecture area and managed object — P/M.Digital product and information-and-technology resources — C/M.
ComponentApplication or technical component as a CI — P/H.Architectural element plus CI or asset — C/M.Product resource and configuration-practice objects — P/L.
InterfaceTechnical access point, contract, and CI — C/L.IT architecture interface — P/L: public semantics are insufficient.No universal formal element is publicly defined — NA/M.
IntegrationDependency, information exchange, and workflow — C/M.Architectural integration and information flow — C/L.Work and information flow between lifecycle activities — C/L.
DeploymentEnvironment or instance CI plus deployment activity or record — C/H.Actual configuration, architecture, and production of a change — C/M.Configuration item plus deployment or release work — C/M; work is not a SAF object.
Compute ResourceInfrastructure CI and/or asset — P/H.Resource, IT asset, or configuration item — P/M.Information-and-technology resource — P/M.
Network SegmentInfrastructure or network CI and dependency — P/H.Network resource in the architecture or asset area — P/L.Part of the information-and-technology dimension — C/L.

ISO/IEC 20000, FitSM, and COBIT

SAF objectISO/IEC 20000-1FitSM 3.0COBIT 2019
ActorOrganization, service provider, customer, and interested party — P/H.Customer, user, service owner, and process role — P/H.Stakeholder, governing body, management, and organizational structure — C/H.
ChannelNo separate object semantics — NA/H.Communication or contact mechanism — P/M.A channel may be part of a process or information, but is not a Core Model object — NA/M.
ServiceService within the SMS scope — D/H.Service and service portfolio — D/H for Service.Services as a governance-system component and subject of service objectives — P/H.
ProcessSMS processes — P/H: the management context is narrower than a SAF business Process.Service-management process — P/H.Process associated with each governance or management objective — P/H.
CapabilityOrganizational capability to manage and deliver services — C/M.Process capability and overall SMS capability — P/H.Objective together with the seven governance-system components — C/H.
Information ObjectDocumented information and records — P/H.Documents, records, reports, and configuration information — P/H.Information flows and items — P/H.
SystemSupporting technology without a prescribed decomposition — NA/H.Service-supporting system or CI — P/M.Applications within the services, infrastructure and applications component — P/H.
ComponentNo formal architectural type — NA/H.Application or technical CI — P/H.Application or infrastructure element as part of a governance component — P/M.
InterfaceNo formal architectural type — NA/H.Technical CI or documented interface — P/L.May be considered within applications and processes, but has no separate type — NA/H.
IntegrationManaged as process or supplier interaction, not a type — NA/M.Dependency and information flow between CIs or processes — C/M.Information flow and interaction between governance components — C/M.
DeploymentTransition or change evidence and supporting technology — C/M.CI in an environment plus release or deployment activity — C/H.BAI/DSS work and actual configuration — C/M.
Compute ResourceSMS resource without architectural specialization — P/M.Infrastructure CI and asset — P/H.Infrastructure in the services, infrastructure and applications component — P/H.
Network SegmentNo specialized type — NA/H.Network CI and its dependencies — P/H.Infrastructure element without a network metamodel — P/L.

IT4IT, SRE, and DevOps

SAF objectIT4IT 3.0.1SREDevOps
ActorStakeholder, product owner, or team role — P/M.User, service owner, SRE/on-call team — P/H.Cross-functional team, product/service owner, and stakeholder — P/M.
ChannelA digital-product interaction channel is not a primary type — NA/M.Critical user journey or entry point — C/M.Customer-feedback channel or product touchpoint — P/L.
ServiceProduct or service model within a digital product — C/M.Observable service boundary — P/H.Product or service owned by a team — P/M.
ProcessValue stream and management functions — C/H.Reliability work, incident response, and operational process — C/M.Delivery value stream and automated workflow — C/M.
CapabilityReference-architecture Capability — D/H.Reliability-engineering capability — P/M.Technical, process, and cultural capabilities — P/M.
Information ObjectManagement Data Object — P/H.Telemetry, configuration, incident, and postmortem data — C/M.Code, artifact, configuration, telemetry, and feedback — C/M.
SystemDigital product and set of Functional Components — C/M.Production system or service — P/H.Product or service system and independently deployable architecture — P/M.
ComponentFunctional Component — P/H, but this is a management-architecture component.Service or component dependency — P/M.Loosely coupled component or service — P/H.
InterfaceFunctional Component interaction and data contracts — C/M.Observable endpoint or dependency boundary — P/M.API or contract through which parts are delivered independently — P/M.
IntegrationData Object flow between Functional Components — C/H.Dependency, traffic flow, and telemetry path — C/M.Pipeline, event or data flow, and system dependency — C/M.
DeploymentLifecycle or release data and operational product instance — C/M.Production instance and rollout — C/H.Pipeline outcome plus deployment record — C/H; activity is not a SAF object.
Compute ResourceTechnology environment in management data — P/L.Resource or capacity unit of a production system — P/H.Infrastructure as code and runtime resource — P/H.
Network SegmentSeparate semantics are unnecessary in the management reference architecture — NA/M.Network dependency, traffic path, and failure domain — C/M.Network configuration and infrastructure dependency — P/M.

Canonical relationship groups

GroupSAFIT management projectionImportant boundary
Value and servicesAn Actor receives a Service through a Channel; a Process realizes a Service.A service offering defines a terms variant; customer, user, and provider roles and an SLA/SLO specialize the relationship.An offering, SLA, or technical service does not replace the SAF business Service.
Processes and capabilitiesA Process requires a Capability; a System supports a Capability.A practice, value stream, governance objective, and team capability organize work.A practice or value stream is usually composite and does not equal one Process.
Applications and interfacesA System consists of Components; a Component provides an Interface.A CI, product boundary, Functional Component, loosely coupled architecture, and ownership provide the operational projection.CI is a control role; an IT4IT Functional Component belongs to the management architecture.
Information exchangeA Process operates on an object; an Integration transfers an object.A ticket, configuration data, telemetry, pipeline artifact, and management Data Object move between tools.Record instances and telemetry do not become an architectural catalog.
Placement and infrastructureA Deployment realizes a Component and is placed on a resource in a Network Segment.A CMDB, IaC, cloud API, pipeline, and observability describe actual configuration.A deployment activity or record is not a SAF Deployment.
Ownership and governanceAn Actor owns an object; the governed level stores source and verification.Service, product, and process owners, governing body, on-call, policy, audit, and assurance refine accountability.One owner is insufficient for RACI, governance, and operational escalation.

Crosswalk usage rules

  1. First identify the user question and authoritative repository.
  2. Preserve source identifiers and create a separate mapping_id.
  3. For partial and composite correspondence, document the transformation rule.
  4. Do not create a fictitious SAF object for every ticket, SLO, CI, or pipeline run.
  5. Check the validity period and direction of the reference.
  6. Treat low confidence as a reason for manual review, not automatic import.
  7. Do not use the table as evidence of conformity with an external standard.